Archive | April, 2008

Small changes to search on Intute: Social Sciences

30 Apr

We have made a small change to how search works on Intute: Social Sciences. As some of you may know Intute is made up of four subject groups ourselves, Arts and Humanities, Health and Life Sciences and Science, Engineering and Technology. The default search now searches across all four subject groups and provides links to search results in other groups.

image2.jpg

So in the example above a search for “human rights” means you can click through to the results in Arts, Health or Science for this topic, as well as, finding resources in the Social Sciences section of Intute.

Why not try it out with some other popular searches such as social exclusion, Marx, environmental economics or blog.

We hope this mean that you get far fewer instances of searches retrieving no hits and will make you aware of some of the other great resources available on Intute. If you have any feedback on this or any other search issue on Intute, then why not get in touch.

Pennsylvania Primary Punch-up

22 Apr

Pennsylvania sealIt crunch time yet again in the primary elections for candidates for the US Presidency. After Ohio, Super Tuesday and even New Hampshire, surely this time the Pennsylvania primary really must decide the Democratic nomination once and for all … well, no – we’ve had a six week break since the last primary, but still no knock-out blow.

The VoteMaster at Electoral-Vote.com sees Hillary Clinton taking Pennsylvania by a solid 10 point margin, but as ever the devil is in the detail, with the allocation of delegates meaning that she may only gain about 10 delegates in the overall race.

The latest from Gallop shows that Democrats are split evenly as whether they believe the ongoing race is helping or hurting the party, although as you may expect, Clinton supporters are happier for the race to continue than Obama supporters.

If it really is getting all too much for you, then why not enjoy a little distraction with this YouTube video that crosses Barack Obama with the film Rocky

Follow the results as they come in via the CNN Election Center.

Intute: Social Sciences features more resources on the 2008 US elections – just scroll past the Editor’s Choice selections to see the latest additions

Imprisoned by your VLE – use Facebook instead?

18 Apr

Yesterday, I attended the Education Support Unit Easter School here at the University of Bristol. As part of the session on collaboration, Mike Cameron from Durham University spoke about the educational potential of Facebook – I must confess that I was dubious that anything genuinely educational was going on there.

He contrasted the formal, educational experience of online learning that is represented by Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) with the free for all that is found on social networking sites like Facebook.

Panopticon

Land and Bayne (2002) have even gone as far to suggest that VLEs have similar characteristics to Bentham’s Panopticon (shown above), a design for a prison where inmates are kept in check by the possibility that everything they do is being watched or in the case of a VLE tracked, assessed and recorded.

Mike told us about an academic at Durham who was invited into an existing Facebook group that her students had set up to support each other in their course. She did not actively take part in the group, but used what she learnt there to improve interactions within the course VLE, address topics that the students did not fully understand in subsequent lectures and relate topics in the syllabus to students areas of interest, as stated in their Facebook profiles.

Durham followed this up with a survey of their students use of Web 2.0 sites and one sixth of them said that they were consciously learning with their classmates in such spaces. However, students feel that such spaces belong to them, a theme I have encountered before when looking at Web 2.0 activity in schools and educational uses of YouTube.

It appears that students are learning in Facebook, the question is what – with no quality control without the watchful teacher / prison guard. If academics are invited into these spaces by their students, they can engage with them to improve the quality of the teaching and learning experience, as long as they respect the fact that it is an informal learning space where they are not an authority figure.

Mike’s paper from ALT-C 2007 Whose e-learning is it anyway? A case study exploring the boundaries between social networks and VLE courses gives a learning technologist perspective on all this and it also includes a set of PowerPoint slides.

Intute: Social Sciences features more resources on social networking, educational technology and Web 2.0.

Imprisoned by your VLE – use Facebook instead?

18 Apr

PanopticonYesterday, I attended the Education Support Unit Easter School here at the University of Bristol. As part of the session on collaboration, Mike Cameron from Durham University spoke about the educational potential of Facebook – I must confess that I was dubious that anything genuinely educational was going on there.

He contrasted the formal educational experience of online learning that is represented by Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) with the free for all that is found on social networking sites like Facebook.

Land and Bayne (2002) have even gone as far to suggest that VLEs have similar characteristics to Bentham’s Panopticon (shown above), a design for a prison where inmates are kept in check by the possibility that everything they do is being watched or in the case of a VLE tracked, assessed and recorded.

Mike told us about an academic at Durham who was invited into an existing Facebook group that her students had set up to support each other in their course. She did not actively take part in the group, but used what she learnt there to improve interactions within the course VLE, address topics that the students did not fully understand in subsequent lectures and relate topics in the syllabus to students areas of interest, as stated in their Facebook profiles.

Durham followed this up with a survey of their students use of Web 2.0 sites and one sixth of them said that they were consciously learning with their classmates in such spaces. However, students feel that such spaces belong to them, a theme I have encountered before when looking at Web 2.0 activity in schools and educational uses of YouTube.

It appears that students are learning in Facebook, the question is what – with no quality control without the watchful teacher / prison guard. If academics are invited into these spaces by their students, they can engage with them to improve the quality of the teaching and learning experience, as long as they respect the fact that it is an informal learning space where they are not an authority figure.

Mike’s paper from ALT-C 2007 Whose e-learning is it anyway? A case study exploring the boundaries between social networks and VLE courses gives a learning technologist perspective on all this and it also includes a set of PowerPoint slides.

Intute: Social Sciences features more resources on social networking, educational technology and Web 2.0.

YouTube and Education

15 Apr

M’colleague Martin Poulter has been blogging about YouTube and education over at the Ancient Geeks blog. I agree with him that there is plenty of educational content on YouTube, but it could be easier to find and I also wonder where are all the YouTube educators?

I would imagine that mainstreaming video production into your normal working routine would be quite difficult, whereas blogging is text based and akin to writing up as you go along or thinking out loud – something that is easier to do and seems to have found an accepted place in academic discourse.

While looking for examples of the use of video in educational settings, I came across a fascinating case study from America.

Alexandra Juhasz is a media studies professor at Pitzer College, in the States. Last year she taught a class about YouTube using the site itself. Students contributions and assignments were uploaded to the site, which Juhasz arranged into playlists and added to with videos of her own.

Here she reflects on her experiences.

The course was picked up by the mainstream media and presented in the stereotypical manner of “What are these people doing watching YouTube at university?” Overall, Juhasz considers the whole experience to have been somewhat negative, describing the YouTube community as one that believes in self-censorship, is surprisingly mainstream and not a place for learning, although they learnt a lot there.

There’s a lot more on her interesting experiment via the archive of videos and playlists on the course YouTube channel and extended writings on her blog.

For more on YouTube and education try EDUCAUSE’s 7 things you should know about YouTube, Graeme Daniel’s collection of annotated links on YouTube and Education or OpenCulture’s 10 signs of intelligent life on YouTube.

Intute: Social Sciences features more Internet resources from and about YouTube, Educational Technology and Web 2.0.

IT Skills Tips and Government Economists

8 Apr

Economics Network logoThe Economics Network have announced a new series of IT Skills Tips for Economics lecturers.

This new section on their website features videos on a range of IT related topics that are relevant to learning and teaching in Economics:

http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/tips/

Their featured tip this month is a 2 minute explanation about the Economics Network Question Bank an archive of assessment questions submitted by the economics academic community, from which you can assemble, view and print exams or tests:

http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/tips/qnbank

They have also started to add a series of video interviews with members of the Government Economic Service, as part of the Why Study Economics blog, Economics in Action – talking about what it is like to work as a government economist.

For more teaching and learning news from the Economics Network, sign up for their monthly email newsletter.

Intute: Social Sciences features more Internet resources on the issue of Economics.

Off to the Brain Gym? I don’t think so …

3 Apr

Brain Gym logoLast night, the BBC flagship news programme Newsnight featured a report on the use of Brain Gym, a technique “about using movement to help the brain to learn more easily” which is apparently being used in a small number of UK schools.

The campaign group Sense About Science is concerned that it is being used in UK schools without a sound scientific basis and that it “encourages pseudoscientific explanations that undermine science teaching and mislead children about how their bodies work”.

It has issued a briefing paper on some of the claims made by Brain Gym, which references a recent commentary by the Teaching and Learning Research Programme on Neuroscience and Education: Issues and Opportunities.

I am intrigued that in recent months I have received some submissions from  a number of education academics in UK universities to increase our coverage of alternative educational approaches – such as the Waldorf/Steiner approach.

However, I have not received similar suggestions on behalf of the Brain Gym approach and having viewed the report and read the briefing paper from Sense About Science, I can’t see a case for featuring their work in the Intute: Education section, but others may disagree.

Intute: Social Sciences features more resources on the issues of Teaching Methods and Educational Psychology and if you would like help us add to them, then why not suggest a site for consideration.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.